From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 16:31:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C8916A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:31:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from web11404.mail.yahoo.com (web11404.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89AB443FD7 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:31:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from raysonlogin@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20031119003133.18473.qmail@web11404.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.49.82.34] by web11404.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:31:32 PST Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:31:32 -0800 (PST) From: Rayson Ho To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: "secure" file flag? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:31:47 -0000 I am wondering if it is useful to have a "secure" file flag?? The secure file flag will be set for files that contain sensitive data. Then the OS will take special care when operating on those "secure" files. e.g. when deleting a "secure" file, the OS will overwrite the file with random data. One advantage would be to have "secure" files in the same filesystem as other normal files. Any one knows if FreeBSD has already implemented this?? Thanks, Rayson __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree