From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May  6 13:28:23 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E37B48
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon,  6 May 2013 13:28:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6420F3EC
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon,  6 May 2013 13:28:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r46DSLBG073060;
 Mon, 6 May 2013 17:28:21 +0400 (MSK)
 (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from glebius@localhost)
 by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r46DSL23073059;
 Mon, 6 May 2013 17:28:21 +0400 (MSK)
 (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to
 glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 17:28:21 +0400
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: TCP_KEEPIDLE vs TCPTV_KEEP_IDLE
Message-ID: <20130506132821.GA15182@glebius.int.ru>
References: <CACyXjPzfw3SAGXa0u6xBQgn79VyGEq7wj9V4GgkRnCazD6-PmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130506082235.GV15182@FreeBSD.org>
 <CACyXjPzG7dQ4_6J9sziNYY3OFGNwvncobjktV6=c9+kfBctAsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130506132332.GZ15182@glebius.int.ru>
 <CACyXjPxAeS0S54FYyibdNoXsGtHafCk1PU2-ha4s2cMf3NkWjQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACyXjPxAeS0S54FYyibdNoXsGtHafCk1PU2-ha4s2cMf3NkWjQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 13:28:23 -0000

On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 06:26:14AM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
R> Thank you for that answer. I don't have the option to install FreeBSD
R> 9.1. Maybe we will move to 9.1 in the future.
R> 
R> However, I now understand the issues better. Of course that does
R> complicate my proposal on Samba technical, just a little.

I don't understand the proposal. Samba correctly compiles with support
for the discussed socket options on those operating systems that support
them. No "fixes" to Samba are required, everything works correctly.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.