From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 1 08:45:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3D016A402; Tue, 1 May 2007 08:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B36613C4B0; Tue, 1 May 2007 08:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l418jEqj005022; Tue, 1 May 2007 12:45:14 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l418jEQC005021; Tue, 1 May 2007 12:45:14 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 12:45:14 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20070501084514.GA4889@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Mark Linimon , Alfred Perlstein , Roman Kurakin , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <20070430180043.GK13868@elvis.mu.org> <20070430181824.GA83415@nagual.pp.ru> <20070430225717.GA7008@VARK.MIT.EDU> <20070501000242.GA19510@nagual.pp.ru> <20070501002817.GA887@nagual.pp.ru> <463690FE.9000209@inse.ru> <20070501010709.GA1304@nagual.pp.ru> <20070501013957.GX13868@elvis.mu.org> <20070501064828.GA3836@nagual.pp.ru> <20070501083032.GA9361@soaustin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070501083032.GA9361@soaustin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Alfred Perlstein , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Roman Kurakin , src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sysinstall main.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 08:45:17 -0000 On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:30:32AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:48:28AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:39:57PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > Using the strategy "commit to -current then suffer the fallout" > > > is pretty bogus. > > > > The only possible. Nobody can run all ports at once. Kris already promise > > all ports build results with those changes in, lets see. > > There have been many runs, in the past, with src changes put into the > cluster and then tested, before the src changes were committed. This is > the process that is always used to get new versions of gcc into the tree, > for instance. This ones are not such vital as gcc changes which can break all programs at once, so can't be ever nearly compared with. For what we have --current for, if every change will go to the cluster first? And the question remains: Is something currently broken _for_you_? I still have no reports. -- http://ache.pp.ru/