From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Sep 21 6: 8:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.wedgev.com (cm57-70.liwest.at [212.33.57.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D28137B424 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 06:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wedge by smtp.wedgev.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (FreeBSD)) id 13c65k-0003GF-00; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 15:08:44 +0200 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 15:08:43 +0200 From: Bernhard Valenti To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ICQ behind natd masquerade Message-ID: <20000921150843.A12529@cipher.home.at> Reply-To: Bernhard Valenti References: <5.0.0.25.2.20000921083515.00a9aad0@10.0.0.55> <969526426.39c9cc9ac0952@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <969526426.39c9cc9ac0952@webmail.harmonic.co.il>; from roman@harmonic.co.il on Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:53:46AM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD i386 X-Copyright: (C) 2000 Bernhard Valenti. All rights reserved. X-Notice: Duplication, redistribution prohibited without consent of the author. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG sounds plausible.. i changed the timeout for UDP to 600 seconds ( i took a look at the linux icq masq module and that uses 600 too ) in /usr/src/lib/libalias/alias_db.c line 159 maybe its possible to only increase the timeout out for icq ? cause i guess a timeout of 600 can easily flood the table ? regards, bernhard valenti On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:53:46AM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > Just my 0.02$; > The ICQ is uses udp to contact the server; perhaps the natd "forgets" about > your icq session when the interval between the packets is too great? > maybe you need to decrease the interval in icq or increase some timeout > in natd. > However I have no idea if my theory is right, guys, anyone, opinion? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message