From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 19 19:55:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F8310656A7 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312298FC22 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7JJtZhV070347; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:55:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o7JJtZS6070344; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:55:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:55:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: bf1783@gmail.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:55:35 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Xorg Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:55:36 -0000 On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, b. f. wrote: > Warren Block wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Ondrej Majerech wrote: >>> On 08/19/2010 15:02, Warren Block wrote: >>>> >>>> Don't need it in FreeBSD, either. In fact, using it in FreeBSD often >>>> causes hesitant input characters that only show up when you move the >>>> mouse. Or a draggy mouse. Or both. >> >> Finally got motivated to put together a little writeup on this: >> >> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/aei.html > > Isn't your summary (and your last section, despite it being > tongue-in-cheek) misleading, because it says that "AllowEmptyInput" is > bad, when you actually mean that it is _good_, and that _disabling_ it > in Xorg.conf is bad? Or am I missing something? Think of it as having an invisible "To disable hald, using" prefix. But point taken, I'll look at elaborating.