From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 13 00:53:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF6537B401; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (ip114.bella-vista.sfo.interquest.net [66.199.86.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6E543F3F; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:53:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5D7rD6L003918; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:53:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5D7rDa5003917; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:53:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:53:13 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Juli Mallett Message-ID: <20030613075313.GB3769@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Juli Mallett , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200306130737.h5D7bjY7031884@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200306130737.h5D7bjY7031884@repoman.freebsd.org> cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/xargs xargs.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 07:53:16 -0000 On Fri, Jun 13, 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > jmallett 2003/06/13 00:37:45 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > usr.bin/xargs xargs.c > Log: > Use waitpid, instead of wait3, which is more portable. Just out of curiosity, why do we care about the portability of our own userland utilities to someone else's kernel that doesn't support wait3()?