From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 29 18:58:49 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FCE16A4BF
	for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023F443FE3
	for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de)
Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	h7U1wilc087951;	Sat, 30 Aug 2003 03:58:44 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de)
Received: (from marius@localhost)
	by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7U1wcdS087950;
	Sat, 30 Aug 2003 03:58:38 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from marius)
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 03:58:38 +0200
From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
To: Pete Bentley <pete@sorted.org>
Message-ID: <20030830035838.A87651@newtrinity.zeist.de>
References: <20030822013101.A24406@newtrinity.zeist.de>
	<352D3384-DA81-11D7-8C90-000A959F6E56@sorted.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <352D3384-DA81-11D7-8C90-000A959F6E56@sorted.org>;
	from pete@sorted.org on Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 01:30:50AM +0100
cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Netra X1 - Status query and stupid question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:58:49 -0000

On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 01:30:50AM +0100, Pete Bentley wrote:
> On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 12:31 AM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > Just curious, could you please try the attached patch and check if the
> > MAC addresses get set and then set local-mac-address in the 
> > OpenFirmware
> > and check again if the dc interfaces get different MAC addresses?
> 
> Sorry for being a bit slow here, had other issues to deal with.
> 
> I've just tried this patch - applies fine, builds fine (prevents the
> dc module from building, but I simply disabled that as a workaround).

Adding the following to sys/modules/dc/Makefile should fix this:
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == sparc64
SRCS+=	opt_ofw_pci.h
.endif

> 
> Tried it with and without local-mac-address set and with versions 1.0.1
> and 1.0.18 of the Netra boot PROM and it works the same in all 4
> instances...
> 
> Works the same as Solaris 9, that is dc0 gets the hosts's MAC address 
> and dc1
> gets that address 'plus 1' (see output below).
> 
> So in effect, local-mac-address is ignored but in a way that isn't 
> likely
> to matter.
> 

This is strange, it rather looks like local-mac-address is always true
for these interfaces, or at least for the second one. You could add a
printf() to check if the call to OF_getprop() fails and the node address
then gets read via OF_getetheraddr().

Thanks for testing!