From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Apr 14 15:34:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA20021
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 15:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA20013
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 15:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA19622; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 15:13:15 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199704142213.PAA19622@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: ISODEVMAP in cd9660 ?
To: phk@dk.tfs.com
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 15:13:14 -0700 (MST)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <421.860999989@critter> from "phk@dk.tfs.com" at Apr 14, 97 08:39:49 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Anybody know  a good reason for not nuking the "ISODEVMAP" stuff in cd9660 ?

Because doing so without making devfs mandatory means that you would
no longer be able to have a bootable CDROM?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.