Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:57:12 -0700
From:      Matt <sendtomatt@gmail.com>
To:        bf1783@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>, Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de>
Subject:   Re: cvsup broken on amd64?
Message-ID:  <4E6A5378.6010601@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGFTUwNCnEmW6GfS9ERAiA=HrG39nuQa%2Bx0WjUS7vZq7BwmJZw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAGFTUwNCnEmW6GfS9ERAiA=HrG39nuQa%2Bx0WjUS7vZq7BwmJZw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/08/11 14:52, b. f. wrote:
>> I have an Atom 330 with 9.0-BETA2/amd64 installed.
>>
>> I did a pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui at first after installation.
>> Using cvsup, resulted in a core dump (illegal instruction).
>>
>> I then removed all ports, and installed cvsup-without-gui from source.
>> Started cvsup... core dump again.
>>
>> I then got the cvsup binary from a FreeBSD 8 i386 system, installed
>> compat8x and also copied the missing libutil.so.8 from FreeBSD/i386
>> and cvsuped the source (8.2-STABLE i386 cvsup worked).
>>
>> Then I rebuilt world, kernel (removed all debugging options from GENERIC).
>>
>> Then I removed all ports once more and reinstalled cvsup-without-gui
>> from ports once more.
>>
>> And now again...
> It may be broken -- I seem to recall some earlier complaints about
> problems on one of the list.  But is there a reason why you are
> attempting to use it, when /usr/bin/csup is available, and is
> generally thought to be superior?
>
>
> b.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Does cvsup work for anyone? At what point should cvsup just be a symlink 
to csup?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E6A5378.6010601>