Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 09:58:20 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> To: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fwd: [package - 140amd64-default][security/softether-devel] Failed for softether-devel-4.43.9799.b in build Message-ID: <86ikz7vboj.fsf@ltc.des.dev> In-Reply-To: <29539043-8902-45dc-8d3a-98fda99a1d18@FreeBSD.org> (Koichiro Iwao's message of "Tue, 21 May 2024 13:21:42 %2B0900") References: <6649770b.2812.4e959043@beefy12.nyi.freebsd.org> <29539043-8902-45dc-8d3a-98fda99a1d18@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> writes: > pkg-fallout reports the following build error. However, it builds > perfectly on my local poudriere setup. Could anyone have an idea > about the difference between local poudriere vs build farm? Parallelization. The upstream Makefile assumes that the sources are compiled in order and creates the object directory only when compiling what it believes to be the first one. Either patch the upstream Makefile or add MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes to the port Makefile. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ikz7vboj.fsf>