From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 7 11:53:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from snark.ptc.spbu.ru (snark.ptc.spbu.ru [195.19.225.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A658137B503 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:53:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uwe@localhost) by snark.ptc.spbu.ru (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id WAA02755 for ports@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:53:06 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:53:05 +0300 From: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Stable and devel ports Message-ID: <20010207225305.C2444@snark.ptc.spbu.ru> Mail-Followup-To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Porter's handbook doesn't seem to touch this topic. What are the best current practice for maintaining a stable and a -devel versions of a port? Are any special arrangements to allow them to live side by side desirable or one can safely assume that its stable XOR devel. Thanks. SY, Uwe -- uwe@ptc.spbu.ru | Zu Grunde kommen http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message