Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:50:30 +0100
From:      Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   tinderbox question (Was: Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx)
Message-ID:  <4F3E30F6.2040503@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F3E2E08.40007@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4F3E289D.9050605@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E2CED.90601@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E2E08.40007@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alex Dupre wrote:
> And consequentially it should be bumped *only if* a direct dependency
> has a library version bump.

This doesn't solve the fact that in 3 days my tinderbox has rebuilt 
nearly all ports 4 times. Is there a way to say tinderbox to not rebuild 
every ports (without portrevision bump) that depends on a just rebuilt port?

-- 
Alex Dupre



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F3E30F6.2040503>