Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:50:30 +0100 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: tinderbox question (Was: Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx) Message-ID: <4F3E30F6.2040503@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F3E2E08.40007@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F3E289D.9050605@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E2CED.90601@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E2E08.40007@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alex Dupre wrote: > And consequentially it should be bumped *only if* a direct dependency > has a library version bump. This doesn't solve the fact that in 3 days my tinderbox has rebuilt nearly all ports 4 times. Is there a way to say tinderbox to not rebuild every ports (without portrevision bump) that depends on a just rebuilt port? -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F3E30F6.2040503>