From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 10:50:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CD6106564A for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:50:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A0488FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91119 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2012 10:50:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alex.andxor.it) (192.168.2.30) by andxor.it with SMTP; 17 Feb 2012 10:50:30 -0000 Message-ID: <4F3E30F6.2040503@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:50:30 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120201 Firefox/10.0 SeaMonkey/2.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <4F3E289D.9050605@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E2CED.90601@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E2E08.40007@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F3E2E08.40007@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-viet-vps; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: tinderbox question (Was: Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:50:33 -0000 Alex Dupre wrote: > And consequentially it should be bumped *only if* a direct dependency > has a library version bump. This doesn't solve the fact that in 3 days my tinderbox has rebuilt nearly all ports 4 times. Is there a way to say tinderbox to not rebuild every ports (without portrevision bump) that depends on a just rebuilt port? -- Alex Dupre