From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 6 22:56:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F601065C8A; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE008FC0A; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi15 with SMTP id 15so12568998pwi.3 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:56:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7v+sRt3vtLtOQmLPBiywCa+Y2NMSOmYof6iOA1a+ubM=; b=DuFYT8EyO0tnzsG8uCv+mWdmrZXPKrumakEGxHygiiKc+dtwtoCQs0TkulYF/CIotK n8uLJIthgtszB8mJpWu8XUluRWCoC6ujEo6j5ewf+XU4OgPh6Mr99Llxu40AYPKHpHsO gMavjNSBUaLKy2wfMQlngf4GjcuU0SvaVukeU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GjIhrcCgBBrw+Y2FDc365vV4CCyaTEfIfd0Gkavabgpu2LzUCgRijT9zc5JtDQG54g XbfAzU80TCGZIxqPWh+0LVe6HJKROVlTkFdk5A1WWxVFzQUQeJRRxjZM+SWLKzu8vjaI cQ98q23Xjiggs444lXxVLTdG/LVMMQygEEt6M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.138.10 with SMTP id l10mr1004563wad.3.1262818614478; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:56:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:56:54 -0800 Message-ID: From: Xin LI To: Matt Reimer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-fs , Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: PATCH: teach (gpt)zfsboot, zfsloader to discern vdev status correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:56:58 -0000 On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Xin LI wrote: > Hi, Matt, > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Matt Reimer wrote: >> Would one of you be able to review this patch and commit it if it's >> acceptable? This is the same patch I submitted last month. > > By the way, I think the patch has raised TEMP_SIZE from 128K to 1MB, > how was the number being chosen? Never mind, I have found the original discussion about this. Cheers, -- Xin LI http://www.delphij.net