From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 27 19:20:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF814158 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 19:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-x22e.google.com (mail-ve0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 767311870 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 19:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f174.google.com with SMTP id pa12so4913644veb.5 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:20:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sv613tyQDHTq4jZbU1eLPewFlDh05975Pln3al1NUsw=; b=Awa0ksUA2dJo9RVu4P85Lab4iqHk6fyz6oKwOk5dFkbKB27wpjl7636Ldaqf7c9mi7 HnSdwRtmzPabsBqRAXNq6Yt8Wv9S0ZNw2OqtBQCp2AKjsPdTPfxBVzSxJLU8Xhu+YguS ExjDm5cS2tfiwh3LVKl+/m4odY6bpX8DJp7HZ4om8zcLJYEHN42Li1ZT+z44xYSAT7Hd RWLPSliTpDsvDTI2w7uMwPqwF1Qsmv3MHvWLOm2UF8llGuu1xqqEOa5Dtmty1lZzG+se LY51nIdjShoxTSPIpXWFqGb7kVEVCkUlLu5WbR4H9awPdLnlM3kL3+osM6i6j+O0GThi TE8g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.245.132 with SMTP id xo4mr5971877vdc.64.1388172055552; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:20:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.229.137 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:20:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131008031225.GA1320@reks> References: <20131007163111.GB1590@reks.swifttest.com> <20131007231734.GY56872@funkthat.com> <20131008002314.GA56872@funkthat.com> <20131008012451.GE56872@funkthat.com> <20131008031225.GA1320@reks> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:20:55 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT From: Alexandre Biancalana To: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 19:20:56 -0000 On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > On (07/10/2013 21:59), Outback Dingo wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Gleb Kurtsou > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, John-Mark Gurney > wrote: > > > > > > > > But will the work get done to clean it up after the freeze is over? > What > > > > happens if it doesn't, will it get removed before 10.1 or will we > have > > > > to live w/ the code? > > > > > > I still hope not to get hit by bus any time soon.. > > > > > > > on a side note, i applied the patch to stable/9 out of curiosity and the > > kernel failed to build the module > > however i could install fine from ports. > > Correct, there is no support for old kernels in the patch. > Port will be maintained and will provide support for older versions in > case PEFS finds its way to 10.0. Hi, Are there any news about PEFS commit ? Regards,