From owner-freebsd-scsi Fri Aug 27 9:38:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D0A1554E for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:38:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70]) by feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA31510; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:37:40 -0700 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:37:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Stephen McKay Cc: David Kelly , freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Seagate vs Quantum.. opinions? In-Reply-To: <199908270944.TAA28444@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Thursday, 26th August 1999, David Kelly wrote: > > >Matthew Jacob writes: > >> IBM drives are okay, but like a lot of IBM stuff, sometimes do things > >> gratuitously different. > > > >Speaking of which, "camcontrol defects -f block" and every other > >variation of "camcontrol defects" fails to list the bad blocks on my > >IBM drives. > > >Similar messages when using Adaptec SCSI cards. > > Oh! I've been blaming my ncr SCSI card! (Well, the driver for it, at least.) > I'm sure everyone complaining about not being able to read defects lists is > using an ncr based card. I've got some non-ibm disks I can temporarily hook > up. I'll try them too. And I'll try an aha-1540 too just for kicks. If it's a problem with other than the drive, send-pr as appropriate or it won't get fixed (no snickers from the audience, please...) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message