From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 17 18:27:08 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5968E16A4CF
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:27:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D52243D3F
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:27:08 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr)
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mwinf1102.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6DC781C000B7
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:27:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr
	[81.50.80.3])
	by mwinf1102.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 501D21C000A6
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:27:07 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: 20050217182707328.501D21C000A6@mwinf1102.wanadoo.fr
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:27:07 +0100
From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <2810734464.20050217192707@wanadoo.fr>
To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20050217115303.M79020@makeworld.com>
References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641B03@mvaexch01.acuson.com>
 <dcb2c27a050217030879ce4b5a@mail.gmail.com>
 <128456842.20050217185105@wanadoo.fr> <20050217115303.M79020@makeworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:27:08 -0000

RacerX writes:

> That is a very harsh statement ...

It's a very realistic statement.

> Now that you have made it; show us the proof that you base your reply
> on.

I've explained it at length on many previous occasions.

> Show us the urls that says what you said.

Why are URLs more reliable than what I say?  What about URLs on my own
site?

> Show us the white papers that state what you have stated.

Why are whitepapers more reliable than what I say?  What if I'm the
author of the whitepaper?

-- 
Anthony