Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:45:32 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> Cc: pho@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sx locks rewriting - needs testers Message-ID: <20061120224532.GA232@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10610181518k68356528i154267c0bd1b1a77@mail.gmail.com> References: <3bbf2fe10610181518k68356528i154267c0bd1b1a77@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 12:18:16AM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote: > In my P4 branch: //depot/user/attilio/attilio_smpng/... > you can find a sx locks rewriting using the optimized semantic of > rwlocks; in the end this might result in a valuable performance > improvement. I'm using sx(9) locks for Solaris mutexes and rwlocks, as I need locks for ZFS that I can sleep while holding. =46rom my simple tests your locks are stable and ZFS is 10% faster. Nice work. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFYjAMForvXbEpPzQRAlHrAJ4qFZjGYWtc4//lZfylAYr3MUhNaQCbBG98 mIB6AXZ6rdipJyeonJ6bT/g= =4XU7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061120224532.GA232>