Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:13:08 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: another gpt vs mbr (sanity) check Message-ID: <30AA11FC-5E7E-4B0B-BD21-358A74DAD860@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <4B960629.8060208@icyb.net.ua> References: <E1Noh4B-000JjD-5u@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <3158041B-8E00-4A87-8172-741C0AE57131@mac.com> <4B954367.3070804@icyb.net.ua> <FB4B329E-807F-4A47-A86B-AE3BC049A6DC@mac.com> <4B9544B3.80203@icyb.net.ua> <03BFAAEC-6C59-48EF-BED9-2E68ED03E2B6@mac.com> <4B956533.2010900@icyb.net.ua> <D90F9986-8BD1-46C8-995B-C79D9821B496@mac.com> <4B958210.70108@icyb.net.ua> <252BDE43-6021-486A-B4BD-E003F4B07B1A@mac.com> <4B960629.8060208@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 09/03/2010 01:21 Marcel Moolenaar said the following: >> On Mar 8, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>> In short, Apple bootcamp creates an invalid PMBR according to their >>>> own technote. >>> It's not only the technote, it's the GPT spec itself. >> >> Actually, no. The spec clearly states that LBA 0 contains a >> protective MBR for the GPT format (UEFI 2.0, paragraph 5.3.1 >> on page 90). Paragraph 5.2 just the background information so >> that there's something to refer to... >> > > Isn't this what I said? Sorry, yes. I got confused, because I already stated that it wasn't according to the spec. In a sense, I crossed that bridge and then found myself back at it again :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?30AA11FC-5E7E-4B0B-BD21-358A74DAD860>