From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 22 19:43:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBD8106566B for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:43:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE168FC12 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281705081D for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:43:41 -0800 (PST) To: FreeBSD Mailing List In-Reply-To: <4F44E576.5000006@ifdnrg.com> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:43:41 -0800 Message-ID: <27398.1329939821@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: Info and questions about Brother[tm] multifunction machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:43:42 -0000 In message <4F44E576.5000006@ifdnrg.com>, Paul Macdonald wrote: >On 21/02/2012 22:33, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> Port 25 is apparently implementing _something_ that sort-of vaguely acts >> like an SMTP server. However it appears to me that it only accepts e-mail >> for one very specific email address,<...@example.com>, where the '...' >> part is actually a long (unique?) string of letter and numbers that I found >> on one of the config printout pages that I generated when I was installing >> this thing. I have no idea what this is all about. I successfully sent >> a short test e-mail to that address, manually typing in all of the necessary >> SMTP commands (via telnet to port 25) and nothing whatsoever happened. I ha >d >> kind-of been expecting that what I sent (via SMTP) would be printed, but it >> just didn't happen. Maybe I need to sent it a MIME-encoded message instead >(?) >... >I doubt you can email it print jobs... Well, I can't think of any other reason why the printer would be running an SMTP _server_. I mean it isn't as if it is going to be handling outgoing e-mail for anybody. Regards, rfg