From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 16:40:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFB916A4B3; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD37E43FBF; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:40:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA15D2A7EA; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:40:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <3F6A98F3.7080801@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:40:25 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20030920234025.AA15D2A7EA@canning.wemm.org> cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.9 stability update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:40:26 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > All, > > We'd like to get a new poll on the stability and readiness of 4.9. The > belief is that the last of the PAE-induced instability was resolved on > August 31. Is anyone still experiencing unusual crashes, corruption, > etc, on a system that is running with up-to-date sources? Now is the > time to speak up and get the problems resolved so that we can make the > deadline by next weekend. Any new testing would be highly appreciated, > especially in reduced-memory configurations and of course >4GB PAE > configurations. In the spirit of 'eat our own dogfood', the *.freebsd.org cluster has been running 4.9-prerelease as of a few days ago with no unexpected ill effects. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5