From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 31 00:16:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990F35E5; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5150D8FC08; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi1so594919pad.13 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:16:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=zJLdEgXT4QrcCDlPAiW4R0+NdXO1swV5sEKGnDwPjRY=; b=lPDmJ6Uq215AwiCdTZf/IH8sFMvnscjO3otNz21fC90SSqnAQdcTz7EnY/DI30zf+m W1MZrN62CpHzXHQfEQj8oPWWkI9efUwXbAfyAwuR3JcdnoeZ16KRGssl1bcsnpiFhccb fs3XKvydIUP4BIf6sQgeOGZspdTSlqiYpLHzYVkXhawaIdgwVjp6VQDQgxcY8Gmi3rzw E5hXT25zHkgmecck22OY+L/XHgC8fY3ERkRfrLfb0cToL0xx7GDHjZH6gYJBRufCgSmi vjyIYPerR+UeYitawaMvUSLY2UEAlwA/Ya1HHqgkVR9kQ6mX5YIxJeIdEFJS573Sse4h tykQ== Received: by 10.66.88.197 with SMTP id bi5mr96444267pab.58.1351642589829; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.142.190.62] (mobile-166-147-081-075.mycingular.net. [166.147.81.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wf8sm1286287pbc.65.2012.10.30.17.16.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:16:28 -0700 (PDT) References: <4E593932.8060303@FreeBSD.org> <86sj928vks.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4FB39F66-0434-43F1-9705-3C81CDF2A25F@cederstrand.dk> <86ehkm8s5v.fsf@ds4.des.no> <0EF669C7-0ED4-4BD4-9170-C49A7CA91603@cederstrand.dk> <20121025193115.GD40357@in-addr.com> <20121030082900.GH3309@server.rulingia.com> <35AB4227-2053-4678-BE71-576B01E48FE1@cederstrand.dk> <038C004A-6177-472D-A328-90830E04F640@cederstrand.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A403) From: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: How about finally replacing GNATS? Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:16:26 -0700 To: Eitan Adler Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , Adrian Chadd , Erik Cederstrand , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:16:30 -0000 On Oct 30, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 30 October 2012 13:39, Peter Wemm wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Erik Cederstrand w= rote: >> [..] >>> I'm not suggesting send-pr should go. I even provided a script to keep u= sing it with Bugzilla. I'm just curious what's so great about it in 2012. Of= fline is a good argument, and HTTP sucks at offline. >>=20 >> But I am. >=20 > ... >=20 >=20 > There are good reasons to keep send-pr and good reasons to get rid of > it. We are not yet at the stage where it even makes sense to discuss > it. +1 about it being too soon to make official policy decisions. I think creating a catch-all to convert the PR request to a bugzilla bug as o= thers have suggested would be an awesome idea, so that way the only thing th= at changes is the submission link. If nothing more, send-pr can continue to function for ushering bugs into bug= zilla. -Garrett=