From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 09:44:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613B01065678 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 09:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116D08FC1F for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 09:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 50so1416886wra.13 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 02:44:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JW2nPn76IFMUCAtihcAjsSv+6IlCcLgCMac8Zw8EWVY=; b=ILJ5TEIaFIybOsxo0TXUgHSDHezF4A+6E+bUWJerto4Xlf25sGGptgknEvhvWWMpZxUb0rmMiL+zk51aEwvTbl0qiGb27uAFjsVOdI6XOmqR6uT9jp5zJzLHnuC0XTtkZ+aNFM8HM9kncgeSwyXmlvxHPdxy9ZKa1hU1XnYHCnc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=p4ew4eX2s+rT/IOgHZ0G7OTrRa0zGiRgZIWa3mWmHDBQc8CU7KfSHsfRttKTpI3UkB4/w5XFBwt6Ul/e3VTn0khgdBMI+Bu0eGW3OgTL4MA25Ksp0TNiQJtLmiBp6YKZgTxD+FfKfUTmZNUwyC8zZis7azxMvCP+aZV6t2Zo4Rg= Received: by 10.141.51.15 with SMTP id d15mr452990rvk.106.1211881477629; Tue, 27 May 2008 02:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.128.6 with HTTP; Tue, 27 May 2008 02:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 11:44:37 +0200 From: "Niclas Zeising" To: "Harti Brandt" In-Reply-To: <20080527113503.K21021@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080527084233.T65662@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20080527100846.M35026@fledge.watson.org> <20080527091101.W65662@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20080527101517.O35026@fledge.watson.org> <20080527101923.O35026@fledge.watson.org> <20080527113503.K21021@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , src-committers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist BSD.usr.dist src/include Makefile src/lib Makefile src/lib/libatm Makefile atm_addr.c cache_key.c ioctl_subr.c ip_addr.c ip_checksum.c libatm.h timer.c src/rescue/rescue Makefile src/sbin/atm Makefile .. X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 09:44:39 -0000 On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2008, Niclas Zeising wrote: > > NZ>On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Robert Watson wrote: > NZ>> > NZ>> On Tue, 27 May 2008, Niclas Zeising wrote: > NZ>> > NZ>>>> Antoine has helpfully pointed out that the glimpse search string to use > NZ>>>> is actually MK_ATM, which has lots of references. > NZ>>> > NZ>>> If that's the case, I stand corrected. I wasn't really aware there was > NZ>>> more than one ATM implementation, and I thought you've deleted the one that > NZ>>> was and so the knob should be gone. I use the knob myself since I don't need > NZ>>> the ATM bits :) Regards! //Niclas > NZ>> > NZ>> Yes, there's been some lack of clarity on this point, so perhaps I should > NZ>> have been more clear in the commit message: we had multiple implementations, > NZ>> and what I've done is remove the more complicated, older, non-MPSAFE one. > NZ>> FreeBSD still supports ATM and will continue to do so for the forseeable > NZ>> future (we have active maintenance, etc). > NZ>> > NZ>> Robert N M Watson > NZ>> Computer Laboratory > NZ>> University of Cambridge > NZ>> > NZ> > NZ>Ok, thanks for the clarification. > NZ>Then the WITHOUT_ATM knob probably should be updated to control the > NZ>compilation of those implementations instead, if it doesn't already, > NZ>and if it's feasible. To be honest, I don't know whether it does > NZ>something or not. > > It does already. > > harti > In that case I apology for the noice. //Niclas