From owner-dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org Thu May 20 02:39:53 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670D6631BBC; Thu, 20 May 2021 02:39:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjkfbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Flv8m2S5dz3Ly0; Thu, 20 May 2021 02:39:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjkfbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id 36-20020a9d0ba70000b02902e0a0a8fe36so13569714oth.8; Wed, 19 May 2021 19:39:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=81DEhEfWiVgW6/vax+rjmfI/ueXRe16uKlIVc/utYZs=; b=JVlXLaZpTFF/r6vkoFiXSmNQ7ymINVY1ayxjmfwoV0rWoHaEddn0wjIau6MU5Ez3xV Rw2QbgBQOYoddVbLAM4kt04zRvygYBLav0+1NEunWrpgYUWYqy6+fJaUfwLNIFlmJ+Wi bSat9Lb53k7wtcPAguV0JxH/QoVTQIGcAiK33AYiwgNWTjyrsIFsbnyJ6EmyFGY98BHP /mExdLWAwzrgT4X8l1lf3kU4Evx4DkE8lR2ZaCvTi4+oeYXYc5fepebMSiibpvqmDkj6 MHF0d64cKY51PDW6ZG8FnmKhisBErFaXan9nYX5bmSAWGwgoejimeoKkFWNazQuiUAzk 9VFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=81DEhEfWiVgW6/vax+rjmfI/ueXRe16uKlIVc/utYZs=; b=aDvIkffVYh0nCnsHqimC2Wxosbbv2Az098IarLtrHFo2xUpU5tzPmukSYuwDzDGis4 VDb+hq+5yPdqEXp/xUreYTPydZie4RZQy4i36nTLaw6Pj/YwKs6HPhyda8dXD765GRHw p+sp3DuHs+vjGWD2HmHcWCG1IN7C9ukKdhBmYL21SypPx7H3/jv6kmdDKUUQO62MBGdR Mjugb6/K66+2Kgk41LH5nkRbgHFxZihd5bGsHQRDN9CBlFuAFtz7L2nRxAGSDvTtvZM0 b5ijDULEtr9YvgQ57aqh6hqIbAPk8NzL3n3L8QqkPBgtdMFMuyxHQfL8ScN+vKFQv7iz dfig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530//iFT1BUSzx7RmjqzRfukq/aUVjMolZsixGioHXbKHYEF9SVp y1Q9LH07m4lew5i4QnSvJs1FE4FJOhg9BZw/ZR0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMCBfT8F9f5UQt33OKmh6ZHAqdWZx+cEJVxkJ4mwvEeDbFllr9RCoABEt5DxZ7AJxi8ZBNWhfNZNt1DRWhxx4= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2271:: with SMTP id o104mr2106195ota.201.1621478391335; Wed, 19 May 2021 19:39:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202105182101.14IL1Gki054229@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20210519055407.GA9715@belenus.iks-jena.de> <10b475c5-0100-2567-4e92-73b168b97e3f@marcuscom.com> <1DD8ABB9-94B1-4B44-8003-25432A91D520@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1DD8ABB9-94B1-4B44-8003-25432A91D520@gmail.com> From: Benjamin Kaduk Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 19:39:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: 3d846e48227e - main - Do not forward datagrams originated by link-local addresses To: Zhenlei Huang Cc: Joe Clarke , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Lutz Donnerhacke , src-committers , dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Flv8m2S5dz3Ly0 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=JVlXLaZp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bjkfbsd@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::333 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bjkfbsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.50 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::333:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::333:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::333:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[dev-commits-src-all,dev-commits-src-main] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the src repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 02:39:53 -0000 On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:33 PM Zhenlei Huang wrote: > > IMHO, I'd like to see the RFC reference remain. I see rgrimes response > > that the RFC's can change with errata and bis docs, but the anchor still > > provides additional context that one can use to learn more about why > > this code exists, and they can chase any future forward references. > RFC's indeed change, and I think it is common in network stack. Then we > need guidelines to better regulate these. CC rgrimes . > Sorry, RFCs themselves do not change -- one of the distinctive features of RFCs is precisely that they are immutable once published. The sentiment that what the current RFC for a given topic is, can change, is something that I can agree with, but that's not quite what was being discussed. -Ben