From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jun 18 07:35:34 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA29678
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 07:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA29670;
          Tue, 18 Jun 1996 07:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id HAA00294; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 07:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@freebsd.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: xditview 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jun 1996 12:14:49 +0200."
             <199606181014.MAA01844@vector.jhs.no_domain> 
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 07:35:28 -0700
Message-ID: <292.835108528@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I seem to recall someone complaining it wouldnt compile if there was no
> X tree resident, could it have been removed just because of that ? !

Well, if ones source tree were 99% X source code free, wouldn't you be
tempted to go for that final 1%? :-)

In any case, I think the handwriting is on the wall for a different
approach to packages like groff and gcc (encapsulation) and, if/when
that happens, things like xditview will magically "come back" for
free.

					Jordan