From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 19:50:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7695B16A401 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2511413C480 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3FJo67m059086 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l3FJo6v8059084; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:50:06 GMT Message-Id: <200704151950.l3FJo6v8059084@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Cc: Subject: Re: i386/111591: [Releng_6][i386][acpi_ibm] dev.acpi_ibm.0.events returns I/O error X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "\[LoN\]Kamikaze" List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:50:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/111591; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" To: remko@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/111591: [Releng_6][i386][acpi_ibm] dev.acpi_ibm.0.events returns I/O error Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:42:12 +0200 Remko Lodder wrote: > [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Remko Lodder wrote: >>> Synopsis: [Releng_6][i386][acpi_ibm] dev.acpi_ibm.0.events returns >>> I/O error >>> >>> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >>> State-Changed-By: remko >>> State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 15 09:16:55 UTC 2007 >>> State-Changed-Why: duplicate of 111590 >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=111591 >>> >> >> What does a problem with the acpi_ibm module have to do with psm? I >> think those are two distinct problems. Other acpi features that are >> not used through the acpi_ibm module work fine. > > As you might have seen this already had been corrected. > Thanks for the headsup though, > > regards, > remko I cannot seem to find another PR about this. If it has already been corrected, I suppose these corrections didn't make it into stable, yet.