From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 21:20:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65151065684 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24118FC12 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (74.93.213.161) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.278.0; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 14:20:09 -0700 Message-ID: <486BF107.3030206@p6m7g8.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:20:07 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Applications Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080414) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger , ruby@freebsd.org References: <486BEC5F.1060108@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Actual Question! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:20:09 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> devel/rubygem-rgl/Makefile:RUN_DEPENDS= >> ${LOCALBASE}/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/specifications/stream-0.5.gemspec:${PORTSDIR}/devel/rubygem-stream >> >> >> vs >> >> www/rubygem-rubyfulsoup/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS= >> rubygem-htmltools>=1.10:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/rubygem-htmltools >> >> >> IMHO the second is better, because you can use >= or leave it out and >> not break higher level ports every-time you upgrade a lower one. >> >> I'm going to a file a PR to change the 9 ports shortly. > > Have you check rubygem's dependencies requirement before you care about > how much dependencies there are? Just make sure in case. ;-) Try that again, I don't quite get the question ?