From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 27 12:26:48 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320F116A403
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:26:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC70313C45D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:26:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3RCQZfq032266;
	Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:26:35 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nagual.pp.ru;
	s=default; t=1177676796; bh=DM8MANG3THENAiBIz3EwqiDh6776wTOX7EzYq/V
	RMSw=; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:
	Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:
	Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=acdGSpKyB6QRYm1DovOA
	wDTkFZ6hSuNPSWr0B/jVB4y4ShlpRn760SVMun1zIvSQvXeUTzYvGth5TBHRQsIwHEN
	22/YyOnr/FWiLch4FDxVgI5nLhtZ81fA6b3djpa3EFl/lIsVhzWj36t+yawI86JBZCD
	sCzQIkESQ+G4HL/sY=
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l3RCQZEM032265;
	Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:26:35 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:26:34 +0400
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: "Sean C. Farley" <sean-freebsd@farley.org>
Message-ID: <20070427122634.GA32237@nagual.pp.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>,
	"Sean C. Farley" <sean-freebsd@farley.org>,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <20070426195122.P37719@thor.farley.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070426195122.P37719@thor.farley.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: setenv memory leak fix (take 3)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:26:48 -0000

On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:10:29PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
>  Are there any opinions on having unsetenv() return a value to match
>  unsetenv() in IEEE Std 1003.1?

There is no much options because we should conform to standards and 
unsetenv() should return int therefore.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/