Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:16:35 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 226083] editors/emacs: FLAVOR not honored by portupgrade
Message-ID:  <bug-226083-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226083

            Bug ID: 226083
           Summary: editors/emacs: FLAVOR not honored by portupgrade
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: emacs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: terry-freebsd@glaver.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(emacs@FreeBSD.org)
          Assignee: emacs@FreeBSD.org

I installed emacs with "cd /usr/ports/editors/emacs; make FLAVOR=3Dnox inst=
all"
and also have "DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Demacs=3Dnox" in /etc/make.conf. The only=
 options
set in the emacs port are SOURCES and KQUEUE.

However, doing a subsequent "portupgrade -f emacs-nox" proceeds to (apparen=
tly)
build the regular (not "nox") flavor, as over a dozen X-related ports were
built and installed before the build paused to ask me to select config opti=
ons
for graphics_gdk-pixbuf2. At that point I ^C'd the build and proceeded to c=
lean
up the leftover mess.

My local ports tree is at r462474, kernel+world is at r329696 (11-STABLE,
amd64)

P.S. Isn't FLAVOR=3Dnox redundant with OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DX11 (and frien=
ds)?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226083-13>