From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 10 18:47:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F45106566C for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:47:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756DE8FC0A for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7AB9CB104; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:46:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s8ZqK8wOxGsK; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:46:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4124A9CB12B; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:46:55 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2AIktw6096439; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:46:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:46:55 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: "Sean C. Farley" Message-ID: <20090310184655.GA96302@freebsd.org> References: <49B48FC3.70105@ongs.co.jp> <80900349@bb.ipt.ru> <49B5DE6E.6030905@ongs.co.jp> <11308704@bb.ipt.ru> <20090310085518.19936d06a3qyy2w4@webmail.leidinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: How to config timezone of linux_base-f8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:47:09 -0000 > On a related note, would it be possible to be able to run one > application under 2.4.2 emulation while another is under 2.6.16 in the > future? I thought it may help in some situations. There could be a > /compat/linux.f8 (with /compat/linux linking to it) and > /compat/linux.fc4 where the application can be told via an environment > variable to use a specific install. speaking from top of my head... yes, this could be done, theoretically. the 2.6 sysctl would have to be made per-proc (as netbsd does iirc), and then it should work. noone has done it yet