From owner-freebsd-arch  Wed May 24 12:50:30 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7ED37BC72
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 24 May 2000 12:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA84529;
	Wed, 24 May 2000 12:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Chuck Paterson <cp@bsdi.com>
Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Preemptive kernel on older X86 hardware 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 24 May 2000 12:29:28 MDT."
             <200005241829.MAA07732@berserker.bsdi.com> 
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 12:52:26 -0700
Message-ID: <84526.959197946@localhost>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> 	Yes, this can be done. We did consider this for
> BSD/OS and I forgot about it. It is actually a very legitimate
> way to solve the problem.

I like this idea too. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message