From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 12 22:44:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A9614C57 for ; Wed, 12 May 1999 22:44:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA42276; Wed, 12 May 1999 23:43:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA26417; Wed, 12 May 1999 23:44:30 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199905130544.XAA26417@harmony.village.org> To: mi@aldan.algebra.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 May 1999 16:48:39 EDT." <199905122048.QAA72725@misha.cisco.com> References: <199905122048.QAA72725@misha.cisco.com> Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 23:44:30 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <199905122048.QAA72725@misha.cisco.com> Mikhail Teterin writes: : Perhaps, the newbus vs. newconfig discussion can be summarized to both : sides' satisfaction offline and then presented to the rest of the world? It is my impression that the language barrier has made this discussion harder to follow. In all the discussions I've seen, both here and elsewhere, it seems like the two sides are talking past one another. That's one reason I really like Doug's idea for a meeting at Usenix (sadly, I'm unable to attend). This isn't a simple issue, and there are many subtle advantages and disadvantages to both systems which are hard to convey in email... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message