Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Jul 2003 15:08:37 +0930
From:      Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Where can I find FreeBSD-related SCO lawsuit updates?
Message-ID:  <20030713053837.GC94666@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F0EB5BB.1080203@potentialtech.com>
References:  <20030709125055.GA90046@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20030709193315.A494@citusc.usc.edu> <20030710123509.GA97000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3F0D6AAD.9030406@potentialtech.com> <20030710141516.GA97366@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3F0DAFDA.2050708@potentialtech.com> <3F0E91FB.57B452A5@mindspring.com> <3F0EB5BB.1080203@potentialtech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday, 11 July 2003 at  9:03:55 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
>>
>> In any case, there wasn't any such legal precedent established
>> Novell permitting the distribution of FreeBSD and NetBSD.
>
> I'm still having trouble understanding the motive behind all this.
> Obviously, SCO can't seriously believe they can gain anything from
> this lawsuit ... Are they nuts and actually think they can win?  Is
> there some other motive that no one has yet to discern?  Even if
> the "Microsoft Conspiracy" theories are true, what does MS expect
> to gain from such a silly attack, and why would SCO agree to be
> a patsy?

My current best guess is that they're hoping to get royalties from
Linux.  That's why they don't want to identify the code; they want it
to be in there.  They've said a number of things that point to this
conclusion.  See http://www.lemis.com/grog/SCO/sontag.html:

   "GPL has the same derivative rights concept [as UNIX]," according
   to Sontag: "Once contributed, code cannot be removed."

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/EPBdIubykFB6QiMRAj0uAJ4xmeSNp7QCR4f4VArh5jqukq4/TwCgjdtl
0FkaNfJfDgjwhmrfbgcOKhk=
=KPoM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU--


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030713053837.GC94666>