Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:09:49 -0700 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: cem@FreeBSD.org, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> Cc: Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r299090 - in head: etc/mtree include lib/libbluetooth sbin/hastd share/man/man3 sys/dev/xen/blkback sys/kern sys/net sys/sys tests/sys tests/sys/sys usr.sbin/bluetooth/hccontrol Message-ID: <fa854dad-21c0-2056-494f-c95f99f03aab@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAG6CVpXAfbf_bONUh9nsonEUpT%2B14zMfp6saRZTmVAjHJB1isw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201605042234.u44MYBMX054443@repo.freebsd.org> <2368543.Vvp613SNcD@ralph.baldwin.cx> <684f4a82-f48c-b2bb-6a72-5c1dfea11a39@pix.net> <CAOtMX2iKmX9yOg5P5931E2JSRgS2QO4wRDuE8SmcvmR4JxO_Fw@mail.gmail.com> <8074ef26-cb70-2397-b71e-b897a1270d22@FreeBSD.org> <CAOtMX2iJPZS8YY6sLZVi4SsCPYJH6LVtu0Lgj5MWbsP73Jt8Tw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG6CVpXAfbf_bONUh9nsonEUpT%2B14zMfp6saRZTmVAjHJB1isw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/23/16 4:42 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/23/16 1:30 PM, Alan Somers wrote: >>>> UPDATING is updated as of r300539. Any objection to merging this to >>>> stable/10? >>> >>> If any port uses it then yes. Binaries are built from 10.1 and expected >>> to work on 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, etc. >> >> >> Most ports that use bitstring should work. The only ports that won't are >> ports that either store bitstrings on disk or transmit them across a network >> without an explicit serialization step. A few other weird cases would break >> too, like building a port on 10.3, updating sys/bitstring.h, then rebuilding >> some object files but not others. Is there any way to figure out what ports >> might be using this header? OpenHub code search didn't turn up anything. > > It seems to me like this is exactly the sort of ABI breakage the > stable/* branches promise not to make. I just noticed that this is not a library. It's only macros. So I take back what I said. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fa854dad-21c0-2056-494f-c95f99f03aab>