From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Aug 20 11:13:17 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.cioe.com (ns1.cioe.com [204.120.165.37])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4607C15300
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 11:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from steve@ns1.cioe.com)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by ns1.cioe.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA66892
	for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 13:13:06 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from steve)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 13:13:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Steve Ames <steve@cioe.com>
Message-Id: <199908201813.NAA66892@ns1.cioe.com>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Async NFS exports?
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


I asked this on stable but didn't get a response... Would I get any
performance increases by mounting NFS exported partition as Async?

Would my soul be tormented in purgatory for doing it?

Just to be clear... I am wondering if mounting (on the NFS _server_) a
partition (that is exportable) as async will have any performance 
benefits to the NFS clients?

-Steve


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message