From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Sun May 8 15:43:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6362FB332AE for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 15:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A6B1749 for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 15:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 44ED3B332AD; Sun, 8 May 2016 15:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4494AB332AC for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 15:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com (mail-wm0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3FB51748; Sun, 8 May 2016 15:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id w143so16730298wmw.3; Sun, 08 May 2016 08:43:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=rFSw+3zaVPhlpMe+KnHdzvWrgh7kjpSpJ07DibyjQmU=; b=H23XM6/tvVrJb4GQdQ0KBiIdc2PrOgcSVK50kRDPvFk/0W9X40YdkFrlOvJC75E2NE crFzUs4z6w0jVPmqWxbcWAneBJY0ORQBHD+BbH6BkwaULWBkwT+DW+vg26edOGr/t/7m +oQNqAjtG4FUYN3dGqrl5WsizNgKuN4bHfTsUj95yA2iHq/UJ/o1dvPo9Wu6xyChcZXe qer/1YBb88iXvkblWs8UjipaPIfZEs7e3CTvyW67qiyIG7RpPQ9YaeyOovf1Oi9VqVmq EKRe4uGToYnUnf7xsVYP+7QvaQ1cJTF4sIMDw3BcEPgZnckJfONQAqjZFQs7xSDhXQoz Ek9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=rFSw+3zaVPhlpMe+KnHdzvWrgh7kjpSpJ07DibyjQmU=; b=BGHGjIFBktPX6/Sni1h27yXF4xro8hCVJu3glqvDGCApcwFNbPn9a4hjJERrVb42MY dWJWXuqyGuhVD0nxcSz5Ozv2T5woLHWcBNYgR85rnMHEVwSLGPrCW8rilqVn9o9jxVWs AS9c7CF0JBH4dvoFyGr4kb6pePZR/Uguku8B7CTcvr/I1D5kpnSfD04B+jSRd1jjruQ/ yLPIwg7EQ4BM2IGSiyuEav+sjPomG4rWBiGTm8SF17pO4KyoipkluPcjnd+jULORGCiU q/7ahogu4CvdBqZVB2OiQ8tfO2fM6ou91cdmE4D36trg0BiXKEtMiPS50SwlMG09K3Ul wzMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX8QIWZqblLxwP6C34VpKpiCxuAeXIZrxxaAK9GKjt/f/OK6fviuzeXpsnDuneyUTuysh+eQUSvxhqGGg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.60.5 with SMTP id j5mr6697650wma.47.1462722203295; Sun, 08 May 2016 08:43:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.1.88 with HTTP; Sun, 8 May 2016 08:43:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160508150829.GA8849@chd.heemeyer.club> Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 20:13:23 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem with sublime2 and 3 and linux-compat From: mokhi To: emulation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 15:43:25 -0000 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ looks like native > (FreeBSD) lib Yes it is. And IMO it shouldnt search out of compat/linux/usr/lib for libs, no? Also i checked for "compat/linux/usr/lib/libtinfo.so.5" and it exists. On 5/8/16, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 07:01:08PM +0430, mokhi wrote: >> Hi. >> I encountered problem with sublime port that uses linux emulations. >> When i try to run sublime it errors me "compat/linux/bin/sh: error >> while loading shared libraries: /usr/local/lib/libtinfo.so.5: ELF file > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ looks like native > (FreeBSD) > lib >> OS ABI invalid" >> >> As far as i traced running "compat/linux/bin/sh" and >> "compat/linux/bin/bash" has same error too (so IMO it's not bug for >> sublime[23] specifically) >> >> Any idea about reason/solution for this problem ? >> >