From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 18:46:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E62C5; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612AE8FC18; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 811D3B9A3; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:46:12 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Maksim Yevmenkin Subject: Re: svn commit: r241616 - in head/sys: dev/ixgbe net Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:20:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p20; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201210162018.q9GKIG9q013028@svn.freebsd.org> <201210170951.23800.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201210171320.24557.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:46:12 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:46:13 -0000 On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:26:21 am Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > [...] > > >> > Maybe a helper 'if_set_baudrate(ifp, IF_Gbps(10))' that would DTRT. > >> > (It could be a static inline or some such). I would just like to > >> > keep the readability. > >> > >> well, yes, i thought about it, but decided not to do it right away. we > >> could provide shortcuts/macros for "popular" baudrates, i.e. 1, 10, 40 > >> and 100 Gbps. while ixgbe(4) example is not ideal, i thought it still > >> was pretty readable :) > > > > I don't really find it all that readable. IF_Gbps(1) looks like a typo > > to a casual reader. I really think you should have something like: > > [...] > > very well :) would something like (please see below) work? Looks good to me. Thank you. :) -- John Baldwin