From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Sun Nov 19 15:06:20 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0BED93E26
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:06:20 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A526E7B9EA
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:06:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be
 forged))
 by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vAJF6EC3082443
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
 Sun, 19 Nov 2017 16:06:14 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net
X-Envelope-To: vas@mpeks.tomsk.su
Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4])
 by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vAJF6BEv048592
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
 Sun, 19 Nov 2017 22:06:11 +0700 (+07)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Subject: Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec
To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>, Eric Masson <emss@free.fr>
References: <20171118165842.GA73810@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
 <b96b449e-3dc1-6e75-e803-e6d6abefe88e@spam-fetish.org>
 <20171119120832.GA82727@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
 <86o9nytmma.fsf@newsrv.interne.associated-bears.org>
 <20171119145116.GE82727@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com>,
 "Muenz, Michael" <m.muenz@spam-fetish.org>
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Message-ID: <5A119DDF.4090809@grosbein.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 22:06:07 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171119145116.GE82727@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, LOCAL_FROM, RDNS_NONE
 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 *      [score: 0.0000] *  2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains
 *  1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:06:20 -0000

19.11.2017 21:51, Victor Sudakov wrote:

> And the kernel IPsec implementation has had problems with NAT
> traveral. Does it stil have problems and requre extra patches for NAT
> traveral?

No, it has not after IPSec code overhaul in times of 11.0-STABLE.
NAT traversal works out-of-box these days not requiring extra patches.

It needs "nat_traversal on" in the racoon.conf, though.