From owner-freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Thu Mar 28 14:19:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A84155EDAD for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:19:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it1-f175.google.com (mail-it1-f175.google.com [209.85.166.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF5D17388B; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it1-f175.google.com with SMTP id m137so6275567ita.0; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:19:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QUw9O0c+XzQvor1d5DiESs9Dxd349BjyB8u2eR/JR/I=; b=jGlp9XTUlllh5zomOBQQyaL7t6vtPyckB1SVBARoPjzA6QHUTz87jIfbZ1iSJKShdK +dF0SYljh2YQXi74aEIC56tQAXnbVizg4jAdXn7eh13npDnU/0I9pS7BQtXEWbQEqwRU EwN8H2QchNXMtbp9jaA2AAjk6bX+WtjzgKmqWv5ew4TKjuOlCesS2aruJz5TwQW8SJG9 XVIulWe2HKy2/rTrWblJpTCr4ZnDrOAjjvgzKQTstXV4mynr0o+f7sskc1WneSxKATcL o6qGE7DFGEtxKqEB6yb7fTJtagO9hZyZ0yqsWvNyV85ApoNTtwwnt6KAfEIV7qoXmNBk 2YzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU5jG9JyM7fGTSRS0WbXZk8rg+4G8lGFf4LcQp38kfUuxvupNln de+kxPTvEfsBzBYK7e6z1YN9JAU1HXx5LMmwB5XPGQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzNqtwlH4UZecArPTmhHLVo/f5kl9NLmIULOzCy6K2k2j7xELYlbFHyOvUmk82zASX3K2VNPa7CTMQ8J1JXq28= X-Received: by 2002:a24:5a8d:: with SMTP id v135mr145370ita.87.1553782333627; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:12:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:29:22 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2019-03-24 To: Li-Wen Hsu Cc: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EF5D17388B X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.24 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[175.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.709,0]; IP_SCORE(-2.52)[ip: (-6.52), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.87), asn: 15169(-2.15), country: US(-0.07)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:19:49 -0000 On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 06:26, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > > * 2286 builds (98.3% passed, 1.7% failed) were executed on aarch64, > amd64, armv6, armv7, i386, mips, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, > powerpcspe, riscv64, sparc64 architectures for head, stable/12, > stable/11 branches. This is pretty good news - HEAD is almost always in a buildable state. > * 498 test runs (37.3% passed, 60.7% unstable, 2% exception) were > executed on amd64, i386, riscv64 architectures for head, stable/12, > stable/11 branches. This is not so good, almost two thirds of test runs don't pass. Does it make sense to submit PRs for the current known issues and then either XFAIL or disable those tests, so that CI will highlight newly introduced failures?