Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:03:04 +0800 From: "Sepherosa Ziehau" <sepherosa@gmail.com> To: "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org> Cc: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, araujo@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate Message-ID: <ea7b9c170803250203l6e3769ablcba65df6c1f5a4b6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47E7EAA8.7020101@elischer.org> References: <slrnfud9lu.1rus.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> <47E79636.1000909@FreeBSD.org> <47E7EAA8.7020101@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: > 3/ possibly keeping per CPU stats.. This probably is the trickest part, not difficult for non-fastforward case. But if fastforward is enabled, I could only imagine full cross-cpu states duplication. Best Regards, sephe -- Live Free or Die
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ea7b9c170803250203l6e3769ablcba65df6c1f5a4b6>