From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 30 08:36:06 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4A637B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BCC43F75
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3UFa4Nj011541;
	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:36:04 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:44:48 +0200."
             <20030430104448.GD400@nitro.dk> 
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:36:04 +0200
Message-ID: <11540.1051716964@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Disklabel bug? 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:36:06 -0000

In message <20030430104448.GD400@nitro.dk>, "Simon L. Nielsen" writes:

>I have a disk with two slices since I need more partions than on slice
>can hold.  I have one 20GB and one ~200GB but when I edit the disklabels
>for the two slices it looks like disklabel(8) get the total size of the
>slize wrong (sectors/unit).  It uses the size of the entire disk instead
>of the slice causing disklabel to complain about the c partion being
>wrong size.

Hmm, I just tried this on my test box, and it came out right, so I 
wonder if you can remember the exact steps which brought you in
this situation ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.