From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb 12 10:38:20 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA18043
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 10:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA18037
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 10:38:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA20464; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 11:34:35 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199602121834.LAA20464@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Anybody using netns?
To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 11:34:35 -0700 (MST)
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <9602121735.AA23383@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett A. Wollman" at Feb 12, 96 12:35:23 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> Unless someone else is both currently using this code /and/ willing to
> maintain it for us (which includes at a minimum eliminating the kernel
> compilation warnings), it will be nuked in a day or so.
> 
> Speak now or forever hold your peace!

Why remove things that are optional, but not present by default?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.