From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 16 14:37:52 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C395616A41A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:37:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E5E13C459
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:37:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J3ucb-0004vt-TF
	for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:37:37 +0000
Received: from 89-172-51-229.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.51.229])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:37:37 +0000
Received: from ivoras by 89-172-51-229.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim
	0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:37:37 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:37:23 +0100
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <fk3d7a$p1p$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enig2E0F0E5C0112D1EFF27F061B"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-51-229.adsl.net.t-com.hr
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: Behaviour of send()
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:37:52 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig2E0F0E5C0112D1EFF27F061B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

If the SO_SNDBUF option is set on a TCP socket with some size N, and
assuming nothing is queued for sending yet, is it safe to assume send()
won't block while attempting to send a block whose size is <=3D N, even i=
f
the socket is in "blocking" mode?


--------------enig2E0F0E5C0112D1EFF27F061B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHZTgqldnAQVacBcgRAuCnAJ4si2hWcke0anDoPsrRZX50MHgEcACeOlMI
UXv9ZqctLI53iZpW5X//CE8=
=eefa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig2E0F0E5C0112D1EFF27F061B--