From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 12 04:58:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421A4106566B for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alc@cs.rice.edu) Received: from mail.cs.rice.edu (mail.cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFE98FC14 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alc@cs.rice.edu) Received: from mail.cs.rice.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F5E2C2A91; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:58:14 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-2.4.0 at mail.cs.rice.edu Received: from mail.cs.rice.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.rice.edu (mail.cs.rice.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id dxeuq4+R-SRp; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:58:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from adsl-216-63-78-18.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net (adsl-216-63-78-18.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net [216.63.78.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20E82C2ADC; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:58:06 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <49E174DE.90603@cs.rice.edu> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:58:06 -0500 From: Alan Cox User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090404) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <49E11CE7.5050903@cs.rice.edu> <49E172A3.2000108@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <49E172A3.2000108@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: svn commit: r190949 - head/sys/vm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:58:15 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > Off the top of my head, I would almost expect this to conflict with > Java. Haven't tried it, though, so I can't do anything more than > speculate. However, I would encourage testing here. > It doesn't. I verified that the Sun JVM works. Alan