Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:53:06 +0100
From:      Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        Olivier Certner <olce@freebsd.org>, Mike Karels <mike@karels.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: noatime on ufs2
Message-ID:  <f9c364303162b5dcf0d025d0d1329780@Leidinger.net>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfppuaPgM40FpF6rCdTgwjVqOXivJpinNy=69KY7yncu7Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <ZZqmmM-6f606bLJx@int21h> <11453367.ZaXhgXhNnV@ravel> <6430CD93-B4D1-49D6-A39B-B8BCF424258F@karels.net> <3896441.telDhacX5M@ravel> <CANCZdfppuaPgM40FpF6rCdTgwjVqOXivJpinNy=69KY7yncu7Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)

--=_53eb568801c96d0fa085e1e2ea2426aa
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed

Am 2024-01-30 01:21, schrieb Warner Losh:

> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 2:31 PM Olivier Certner <olce@freebsd.org> 
> wrote:

>>> It also seems undesirable to add a sysctl to control a value that the
>>> kernel doesn't use.
>> 
>> The kernel has to use it to guarantee some uniform behavior 
>> irrespective of the mount being performed through mount(8) or by a 
>> direct call to nmount(2).  I think this consistency is important.  
>> Perhaps all auto-mounters and mount helpers always run mount(8) and 
>> never deal with nmount(2), I would have to check (I seem to remember 
>> that, a long time ago, when nmount(2) was introduced as an enhancement 
>> over mount(2), the stance was that applications should use mount(8) 
>> and not nmount(2) directly).  Even if there were no obvious callers of 
>> nmount(2), I would be a bit uncomfortable with this discrepancy in 
>> behavior.
> 
> I disagree. I think Mike's suggestion was better and dealt with POLA 
> and POLA breaking in a sane way. If the default is applied universally 
> in user space, then we need not change the kernel at all. We lose all 
> the chicken and egg problems and the non-linearness of the sysctl idea.

I would like to add that a sysctl is some kind of a hidden setting, 
whereas /etc/fstab + /etc/defaults/fstab is a "right in the face" way of 
setting filesystem / mount related stuff.

[...]

> It could also be generalized so that the FSTYPE could have different 
> settings for different types of filesystem (maybe unique flags that 
> some file systems don't understand).

+1

nosuid for tmpfs comes into my mind here...

> One could also put it in /etc/defaults/fstab too and not break POLA 
> since that's the pattern we use elsewhere.

+1

> Anyway, I've said my piece. I agree with Mike that there's consensus 
> for this from the installer, and after that consensus falls away. 
> Mike's idea is one that I can get behind since it elegantly solves the 
> general problem.

+1

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
http://www.FreeBSD.org    netchild@FreeBSD.org  : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF

--=_53eb568801c96d0fa085e1e2ea2426aa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
 name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename=signature.asc;
 size=833
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=CERi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_53eb568801c96d0fa085e1e2ea2426aa--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f9c364303162b5dcf0d025d0d1329780>