From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Apr 19 0:32:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mired.org (dsl-64-192-6-133.telocity.com [64.192.6.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25F7337B421 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28857 invoked by uid 100); 19 Apr 2002 07:32:30 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15551.51214.565995.577553@guru.mired.org> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 02:32:30 -0500 To: Nik Clayton Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , Bob Bomar , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: overclocking and freebsd In-Reply-To: <20020419080217.M30474@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20011110215343.C961@bsd.alexe.org> <20020411182041.H45395@darius.2y.net> <20020411200534.A25472@ns.museum.rain.com> <20020412042041.GA80748@peitho.fxp.org> <20020412144054.GB2610@hades.hell.gr> <15550.9030.396432.30948@guru.mired.org> <20020418070634.I30474@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <15550.26754.195694.112510@guru.mired.org> <20020419080217.M30474@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ From: Mike Meyer X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.51 (Python 2.2 on FreeBSD/i386) Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In <20020419080217.M30474@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>, Nik Clayton typed: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:32:34AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: > > In <20020418070634.I30474@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>, Nik Clayton typed: > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 08:37:10PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: > > > > The tricky part will be when the timing is warped by the window > > > > manager. I.e., if I've got a WM set to follow the mouse and not raise > > > > the active window, then activating a window is one action for me > > > > (point), but two (point and click) for a windows users. On the other > > > > hand, raising a window is easy for a windows users, because they can > > > > point anywhere in the window, whereas I have to point at the frame. > > > Not if Meta-LeftClick is bound to 'raise window' anywhere in the window > > > area. . . > > That's still slower, because it's one point and two keyclicks vs. one > > point and one keyclick. > On average I'm much faster, because most of the time I'm sending windows > to the bottom of the Z order. It means I don't have to waste time > minimising windows I don't need (which might explain the 17 open xterms > at the moment ). Yeah, but then you have to do that to get to each window, as opposed to getting to any window with three or four keystrokes. I just keep a few things I don't use very often iconified, and have four xterms open now. But they're all up and visible - except for the one on the monitor I leave turned off. http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message