From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 25 08:57:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D45F2A3 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671B81DB3 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Alfreds-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [50.204.88.5]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C88D01A3C19; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 00:57:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52E37C71.1060906@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 00:57:21 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays? References: <52E2FA36.5080106@marino.st> <52E303CB.6020304@marino.st> <52E30990.2060903@marino.st> <52E33AA7.3080205@freebsd.org> <52E3719B.3040503@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <52E3719B.3040503@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:57:23 -0000 On 1/25/14, 12:11 AM, Yuri wrote: > On 01/24/2014 20:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> (maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that >> makes this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt that.) > > github itself is closed source, but 95% of its functionality is based > on git which is open. One only needs to invoke 3-4 git operations to > support what it does on the website side. Register on the site, fork > the project under user's login, submit a pull request, merge a fork's > branch to the main branch. All these are basically git commands. > Without the glossiness of github, this is not that large of a project. > Submitters will do the rest through git. > > I think, instead of tediously going through the PRs by hand, it is > wiser to set up some system like this. > Agreed. +1000 Although if we go down the rabbit hole of building something "like github" that might take a while. For now prototyping using the github pull methods might be a good proof of concept. I may look into doing a github pull request -> GNATS (src) PR gateway if time allows. -Alfred