Date: Sat, 18 Mar 1995 12:13:49 -0800 (PST) From: julian@tfs.com (Julian Elischer) To: mycroft@ai.mit.edu (Charles M. Hannum) Cc: gibbs@estienne.CS.Berkeley.EDU, hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: SVNET Meeting? Message-ID: <m0rq4sf-0003vyC@TFS.COM> In-Reply-To: <199503181419.JAA22722@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> from "Charles M. Hannum" at Mar 18, 95 09:19:31 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > That (mis)information originated from Julian Elischer. Julian said > many moons ago that Adaptec's policy was such, and for a long time it > was touted as the reason for not having a 2x42 driver. You can find > this in your own mail archives. That was adaptec's policy at the time and I still have the documents from when I tried to get the information.. We STILL (I believe) can't get the code for their own interface, which is why we have the Linux developed one.... Adaptec did however have a softenning on some of their stances, which has made the present drivers possible. julian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0rq4sf-0003vyC>