From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 18 13:30:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3326716A4D8; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcelo@registro.br) Received: from clone.registro.br (clone.registro.br [200.160.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A2B43D82; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:30:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcelo@registro.br) Received: by clone.registro.br (Postfix, from userid 1014) id 0D7882A451; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:30:38 -0300 (BRT) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:30:38 -0300 From: Marcelo Gardini do Amaral To: Mike Silbersack Message-ID: <20060918133038.GG6701@registro.br> References: <2a41acea0608301145j7bbed961j33ce903a27d8963d@mail.gmail.com> <20060904130827.GE12975@registro.br> <20060911195521.GD63300@registro.br> <20060913182019.R50147@fledge.watson.org> <20060913182457.W50147@fledge.watson.org> <20060914175049.GH49126@registro.br> <450A2A6E.3040408@yandex.ru> <20060915145120.GA93074@registro.br> <20060915223211.R65248@odysseus.silby.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060915223211.R65248@odysseus.silby.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Andrey V. Elsukov" , Robert Watson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS query performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:30:47 -0000 Hello Mike, > Although it sounds silly, could you try recompiling 6.1 and 7.0 with a > non-SMP kernel and see how they perform? That would at least tell us if > it's a general performance problem in 6.x and 7.x, or if SMP is somehow > hurting performance in this case. I have this numbers spread over my e-mails. Just putting they together: OS q/s --- --- FreeBSD 6.1 SMP 14953 FreeBSD 6.1 UP 15516 FreeBSD 7.x SMP 15323 FreeBSD 7.x UP 16200 FreeBSD 4.11 SMP 34977 FreeBSD 4.11 UP 33926 I think is a general problem in 6.x and 7.x. UP kernel is always a little bit better, but I can't see big changes tweaking from SMP to UP. On the other hand, with the same hardware, 4.11 is twice better in performance. -- Att., Marcelo Gardini