From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 24 14:56:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B09437B422 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net. [192.168.0.24]) by thehousleys.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA59536 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:56:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <39A59A0C.7588265E@thehousleys.net> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:56:28 -0400 From: James Housley Organization: The Housleys dot Net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nuking "unsafe" protocols (was Re: Upcoming rc.conf changes not loading certain currently loaded daemons) References: <251BF6012D6B4A49A4109B1C3289A7B5BB78@purgatory.jumpweb.com> <39A59992.F42F03EC@denverweb.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG blaine wrote: > Umm, why not just use openbsd if security is the primary concern? > Why shouldn't we provide the best level of security possible, using OpenBSD as a target? Jim -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message